kyoto accord - the big fat lie

the kyoto accord must be the biggest load of crud since CFC's were blamed for the greenhouse effect. (it's ClFC's btw. now everyone grab their periodic tables and work out why thats's impossible.)

let's first look at the way it's measures - carbon dioxide emissions. according to the collins student world atlas, published in 2005 so we may assume it's up-to-date, the worst offenders based on the raw, unadulterated data for 2002 are usa, china, russia and japan. eleventh down the list is australia. yet round the world the kyoto greenies decry australia's massive pollution output and how we're (yes, i'm an aussie) failing the world with our dirty blue skies and fluffy white clouds and air so fresh you could gag.

so how do the more poluting nations get away with their 'clean, green' image? i'll let you in on their dirty little secret. they get to pay their way out of industrial reform. they buy their absolution. it's called carbon credits. overpoluting this year? buy you way out of enviro-trouble and keep the shine on that greasy smile.

they also get to hide behind the statistical fairytale known as 'per capita'. 'percentage wise' or 'proportionally' you can breathe the air in tokyo, japan and it tastes sweeter than sydney, australia. just don't try it without a gas mask.

statistics, as any cynic or mathemation will tell you, can prove anything.

interesting and also contributing to the joke that is kyoto is the list of greenhouse gases as stated in the 1997 protocol.

lets have a look at what is on it and what IS NOT on the list;
CARBON DIOXIDE. every animal on earth breathes it out, and so does every plant when it's sickly or in the dark (night, for example). heard of carbon sinks? the pumping and sealing of carbon dioxide artificially and conveniently burying it somewhere. one **slight** problem everyone seems to have overlooked. it has TWO OXYGEN ATOMS!! we happen to need that if we want to continue living.

METHANE. ok, farting is out. so is organic decomposition of any kind, so don't use the toilet either. you are contributing to the greenhouse effect. naughty you. also don't die, it'll only make things worse. forget composting, it may be good for the soil, but again methane is released and that's a big no-no.

HYDROFLOUROCARBONS. this one was brought out to replace CFCs, even though, if it is just a hydrogen, flourine, carbon mocule as the name suggests, as a much lighter molecule they would have to be able to drift upwards into the atmosphere higher. want to know what is in your child's asthma inhaler and nebuliser? you're looking at it. they are also used in refrigerants, blowing foam plastics and aerosols.

a more sensible replacement would have been HYDROCHOLOFLOUROCABONS. but everyone **knows** that chloride is the bad guy. don't they?... by the way, nobody come back and pretend to me that HCFCs are a new discovery.

now for what is NOT ON THE LIST:
the scapegoat of the 1980's, chloroflourocarbons. what, now it's got nothing to do with it? in **theory** it couldn't get off the ground anyway. as a molecule it's just too heavy.

and for the last little mystery - hydrocarbons. light, fluffy, found in areosol cans around the world AND KNOWN TO CAUSE PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG. they definitely get up into the atmosphere.


heres something else about the 1997 protocol you may not have heard about -

have a proposal and don't want some insignificant pacific nation protesting? form a subcommittee and don't invite them. of course there is a "provision" for them to respond when the (favourable) research is presented, but since they weren't involved in the research, and couldnt fund to challenge the findings anyway with their own investigation, how can they present any environmental, social or economic impact studies anyway. "mutatis mutandis" is latin for "don't like it? wear it."

periodic table of chemical elements

these are the links for the periodic table of chemical elements. the first shows some history of the science. the second allows clicking on symbols for explanation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table
http://www.dayah.com/periodic/

O - oxygen
Si - silver
C - carbon
H - hydrogen
Cu - copper
Au - gold
Cl - chlorine
Fl - flourine
Hg - mercury

now each element has a "weight" and a molecule's weight is determined by the total weight of each chemical which it is made from. for example O2 or oxygen as in what we need to breathe in has a mocular weight of 2x8 which equals 16.

oxygen - 8
carbon - 6
chlorine - 17
flourine - 9
hydrogen - 1
nitrogen - 7

think carefully of the following. and a first grader can do maths so we'll start with oxygen or O2 which we've done before:

oxygen = O2 = 8x2 = 16
carbon dioxide = CO2 = 6+(8x2) = 22
chloroflourocarbon = ClFC = 17+9+6 = 32

doing the maths and given the molecular weight of Choroflourocarbons which is actually ClFC and NOT CFC which suggests carbon-flouro-carbon makes it IMPOSSIBLE for it to "float" up into the upper atmosphere, HOW CAN IT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BREAKDOWN OF THE OZONE LAYER?? i mean, let's face it, carbon dioxide, the stuff we breathe out and that goes into balloons when we blow them up with our mouths doesn't exactly keep them up in the air and ClFC is twice has heavy.

from those who watch

know americans and allies of the new world order, who are responsible for the death of eight worlds** and the interference of the social evolution of 43 others (that we know of) that we do watch. and it is time you considered that vanessa, while the one you know as illa d'thjea tahn holds interest in her, is not a hostage but your insurance that you world exists. until that one is dominated, should vanessa suffer death - as we will know, do not doubt it - then you world will be summarily destroyed. we are aware, as you are, of the usefulness of tahn to his people the eholim, and until his will is subjugated, no physically obvious damage must occur to the human he favours for contact. nothing must occur to her which will cause undue struggle on his part. signed, illne'ah



**eight worlds, destroyed in the 'zero point' effacy tests. which in this case means how far the haarp could be 'turned on', the intensity that would cause the world to tear itself apart. the other 43? well, they had to see what partial steps would do. on earth they only caused a 'pinhole', which thinned in a spreading circle the upper atmosphere as it compensated (how can you literally keep a 'hole' in the air?)...

eight worlds... what made their species less important than our own?... i wonder how many of the other 43 will survive the next 200 years.

is this what caused the hole in the ozone layer over the south pole/australia???

testing in the south pole research centers (america has two)? is that why a hole "suddenly appeared"? who has seen this array in antarctica??

...... that is what it is designed to do...

the public patent (number 4686605, lodged by raytheon, the 5th largest american defence contractor), was titled "a method and apparatus for altering a region of the earth's atmosphere, ionisphere (where the ozone layer is), and magnetosphere", and claimed the following uses - cause total disruption of all forms of communications over a very large portion of the earth; missile or aircraft destruction, deflection or confusion; **weather modification by altering solar absorbtion (ie THE OZONE LAYER)** ALSO **altering the composition of the atmosphere**. this patent was classied by the navy under a national security order in 1987.


who has seen these? contact me tahn1000@gmail.com
because that "hole" triggered the global warming movement. and it isn't "healing", as they call it on the news. it's simply closing over, resulting in an overall thinning of the ozone layer which protects our world and makes life on our planet possible.

here is a diagram of the antartica showing the ozone layer thickness between years 1982 and 1994. this comes from the hardcover book titled "Weather - Revised and Updated", published as a revised edition 2007 by The Five Mile Press Pty Ltd, victoria, australia. original copyright 1996 US Weldon Owen Ltd and Weldon Owen Pty Ltd. ISBN:978-1-74178-762-7


the writing is as follows -
THE OZONE HOLE over Antarctica, shown in dark red and pink (above), has grown since the early 1980s. The colours represent ozone concentrations, from dark red for the lowest, through pink, blue, and yellow, to green for the highest.

.... one has to wonder who's teritorial bases were under the center of it at the time, and whether it was "gradual" as claimed - and if it was, why wasnt it noticed earlier?? - or a rather sudden consequence of an american experiment. and note the rather small band of pink around the red bit in the 1986 map. a drastic drop in a relatively small area.

one also has to wonder if chloroflourocarbons (CFC) was just a scapegoat used to cover the real cause up.